I can't speak to the TS-590S because I've never owned one. What are your opinions about these two, did anyone had experience while working on both? Also a waterfall but I don't mind too much about that one.Ĩ) Yaesu has 1 Hz frequency resolution and kenwood 10 Hz frequency resolutionĩ) Much more connections on the back of the radioġ0) It is bigger 365 x 115 x 312 vs 270 x 96 x 291 mm and weights more 10 kg vs 7.4 kgġ1) Based on reviews from eham, there are a lot of people who had 590 saying that after buying 3000 is was much better.Īs I see one downside of the FTDX 3000 may be bit too complicated menu, but I think once you learn it it becomes easy.
It uses texas instruments DSP TMS320C6727B (2800 MIPS / 2100 MFLOPS) similar one is in in FTDX101 it is TMSS320C6746 (2949 MIPS/ 2220 MFLOPS)ħ) Has bigger colorful screen, where it is easier to see how did you set your width, notch, contour. It seems that it has 15 different algorithms while kenwood has only one and you can only increase the intensity of it. I never used 3000 but based on what I've found on internet (correct me if I am wrong), this is why I think yaesu have advantage:ġ) FTDX 3000 has same IF (Intermediate Frequency) as FTDX 101: 9 MHz and 24 kHzĢ) Yaesu have these roofing filetrs: 15 kHz, 6 kHz, 3kHz, 600 Hz, and option to add 300 Hz, TS 590 has only 2.7 kHz and 500 Hzĥ) Dynamic range based on what I've foundġ08.5 dB (10 KHz spaced signals, pre1 ON or OFF).ġ06 dB (2 KHz spaced signals, pre1 ON or OFF).Ĩ7 dB (2 KHz spaced signals, 7 MHz, BW 500 Hz, Pre OFF, RX1)ġ07 dB (20 KHz spaced signals, 7 MHz, BW 500 Hz, Pre OFF, RX1)Ħ) Noise reduction, I think that yaesu wins here. It is very very good radio I've tried it. We all know that Kenwood has tradition in making good radios and I approve that TS-590 is solid rig. Before you post please don't write "Buy Icom 7300". I am about to buy stationary HF station now.
0 kommentar(er)
